Tuesday, October 29, 2013


Assignment #6
October 29, 2013
The Junius Pamphlet: passage



One thing is certain. The world war is a turning point. It is foolish and mad to imagine that we need only survive the war, like a rabbit waiting out the storm under a bush, in order to fall happily back into the old routine once it is over. The world war has altered the conditions of our struggle and, most of all, it has changed us. Not that the basic law of capitalist development, the life-and-death war between capital and labor, will experience any amelioration. But now, in the midst of the war, the masks are falling and the old familiar visages smirk at us. The tempo of development has received a mighty jolt from the eruption of the volcano of imperialism. The violence of the conflicts in the bosom of society, the enormousness of the tasks that tower up before the socialist proletariat – these make everything that has transpired in the history of the workers’ movement seem a pleasant idyll. (“Luxemburg”)

            According to Luxemburg, the war affected everyone. The rich and worst of all the poor or working class. The turning point is when Germany failed to capture Paris, it was the beginning of the end, everything that was to lead to victory failed and Germany was defeated.  People were fooled into believing that once the war was over things would be better, the economy and government would improve. They could return to their safe, warm, home - the government would provide and support –but nothing is the same, life is bleak, the proletariats who were struggling before, now they have to fight for rations, protect their women, avoid mobs, and heed curfews for their own safety among other things. There is little hope for any improvement in the relationship between the poor and the rich sector; there is still a large divide, an imbalance if you will, between the two. There are sudden demands for workers during an opportunistic time, the rich oppress, plunder, and exploit the poor to gain profit. The power struggle among the leaders, the rich and how it affects the poor more so than any other sector is again about to boil over. It seemed intolerable before but now it is survival of the fittest. There is no going back to the good old, simple days.  She was against war, and considered it suicidal.


         Nihilism fuels capitalism and capitalism feeds on anything like a parasite, especially war. Nihilism causes war which leads to destruction and death. War is meaningless, a power struggle if you must, a means to an end, while to the next man it creates a capitalistic atmosphere which may or may not lead to an imperialist gravesite for the poor. When there is war everything changes. There is the opportunity to capitalize on another’s defeat and or victory. There are shortages of food supplies, medicine, arms, failed value of their currency. And worst the atrocities. During and after the war, defeated Germany was crushed, the collapsed economy and unstable government created chaos. Of course the working class has no choice but to keep challenging the unstable government, and the private sector because they need work to feed their families and to survive. Luxemberg helps us to see what many people endured during one of the most difficult times in history, how people in general never gave up hope, even though they felt as if the government had failed them. Bourgeois class domination is undoubtedly an historical necessity, but, so too, the rising of the working class against it. Capital is an historical necessity, but, so too, it’s grave digger, the socialist proletariat. Rosa Luxemburg 

Assignment #6 The Junius Phamplet

Assi

October 29, 2013
Assignment #6
The Junius Phamplet: short passage


One thing is certain. The world war is a turning point. It is foolish and mad to imagine that we need only survive the war, like a rabbit waiting out the storm under a bush, in order to fall happily back into the old routine once it is over. The world war has altered the conditions of our struggle and, most of all, it has changed us. Not that the basic law of capitalist development, the life-and-death war between capital and labor, will experience any amelioration. But now, in the midst of the war, the masks are falling and the old familiar visages smirk at us. The tempo of development has received a mighty jolt from the eruption of the volcano of imperialism. The violence of the conflicts in the bosom of society, the enormousness of the tasks that tower up before the socialist proletariat – these make everything that has transpired in the history of the workers’ movement seem a pleasant idyll. (“Luxemburg”)

            According to Luxemburg, the war affected everyone. The rich and worst of all the poor or working class. The turning point is when Germany failed to capture Paris, it was the beginning of the end, everything that was to lead to victory failed and Germany was defeated. People were fooled into believing that once the war was over things would be better, the economy and government would improve. They could return to their safe, warm, home - the government would provide and support –but nothing is the same, life is bleak, the proletariats who were struggling before, now they have to fight for rations, protect their women, avoid mobs, and heed curfews for their own safety among other things. There is little hope for any improvement in the relationship between the poor and the rich sector; there is still a large divide, an imbalance if you will, between the two. There are sudden demands for workers during an opportunistic time, the rich oppress, plunder, and exploit the poor to gain profit. The power struggle among the leaders, the rich and how it affects the poor more so than any other sector is again about to boil over. It seemed intolerable before but now it is survival of the fittest. There is no going back to the good old, simple days.  She was against war, and considered it suicidal.


          Nihilism fuels capitalism and capitalism feeds on anything like a parasite, especially war. Nihilism causes war which leads to destruction and death. War is meaningless, a power struggle if you must, a means to an end, while to the next man it creates a capitalistic atmosphere which may or may not lead to an imperialist grave site for the poor. When there is war everything changes. There is the opportunity to capitalize on another’s defeat and or victory. There are shortages of food supplies, medicine, arms, failed value of their currency. And worst the atrocities. During and after the war, defeated Germany was crushed, the collapsed economy and unstable government created chaos. Of course the working class has no choice but to keep challenging the unstable government, and the private sector because they need work to feed their families and to survive. Luxemberg helps us to see what many people endured during one of the most difficult times in history, how people in general never gave up hope, even though they felt as if the government and society had failed them.

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

ASSIGNMENT #5 Blue Angel

            It was so sad when Lola laughed when the Professor, proposed marriage to her. She is a cold, calculating character. But I have to agree, she certainly is free-spirited. She is happy and comfortable in her skin, with whom and what she is. She knows no loyalty or true love and probably never did. She knows how to use and manipulate her sexuality decisively.
The second part that I found sad was when he went back to his village and had to face the people he grew up and worked with, as a clown, even his own old friends found it unbearable to watch him. He was a prominent outstanding citizen who was respected by all, to a clown, married to a cabaret dancer of a side show whom he desired and loved.  He married beneath his stature, which is not the norm and so was condemned and ridiculed by society. At the end of the movie, the fore-shadow was the sound of the fog horn of what was to come- his death. ”The idea of freedom as duty turns back into itself and becomes unfreedom to the extent to which it neglects the irreducible factors of the external world” ( murdaco). Teaching was his life but he gave it up to be with Lola, which in the end destroyed him mentally. Even though the Professor followed his superego by upholding values adopted from parents and society and also being very authoritarian to his students and society, he none the less followed his id by following impulses according to the pleasure principle according to Freud’s psychoanalytic theory” (Freud). Many men have fallen from power because of a woman.


"It's All a Swindle" (Alles Schwindel), by Mischa Spoliansky and Marcellus Schiffer (1931)
in 

Politicians
are magicians
who make swindles disappear
The bribes they are taking
the deals they are making
never reach the public's ear
The left betrays, the right dismays
the country's broke and guess who pays
But tax each swindle in the making
profits will be record breaking
Everyone swindles some
so vote for who will steal for you
Bürger schwindelt,
Staatsmann schwindelt,
Schwindel, was die Zeitung schreibt,
Moral und Sitte,
rechts, links und Mitte!
Ehrlich ist, was übrig bleibt!
Alles sucht sich zu betrügen,
na, sonst mübt’ich wirklich lügen!
Bins, das 
kann ich glatt beteuern:
Könnt’ den Schwindel man besteuern,
hätt’ der Staat nicht Sorgen mehr,
denn dann wär’ er Millionär!

 Alles Schwindel, alles Schwindel, usw.

The song is about politicians and their deception and how it affects the citizens who work so hard to survive. I choose this song because it makes sense and it is true. Every day I hear on the news about another politician who is abusing funds or abusing their power in some way. It has always happened in the past and the present is no better. The politicians are just better at deceit now than they were before. The poor, the tax payers, all citizens are held responsible for the actions of someone who thinks he can get away with deceiving the government and the people. Nowadays people are not really surprised by their actions. And that is why it is good that we have the choice of choosing another politician to serve and work for us, the people.


"The Lavender Song" (Das Lila Lied), music by Mischa Spoliansky, lyrics by Kurt Schwabach (1920)
in 
 Cabaret Song Homophobia

 Round us all up, send us away
that's what you'd really like to do
But we're too strong, proud, unafraid
in fact we almost pity you
You act from fear, why should that be
What is it that you are frightened of
The way that we dress
The way that we meet
The fact that you cannot destroy our love
We're going to win our rights
to lavender 
days and nights

 Wozu die Qual, uns die
Moral der andern aufzudrängen?
Wir, hört geshwind, sind wie wir sind,
selbst wollte man uns hängt,
den müte man beweinen,
doch bald gebt acht, es wird 
über Nacht
auch unsre Sonne scheinen.
Dann haben wir das gleiche Recht erstritten,
wir leiden nicht meht, sondern sind gelitten.
Wir sind nun einmal anders, usw.


The song is saying are you going to round us up and lock us away because we are different, based on how we dress, how we look, what we like, and who we like. We freely express ourselves while you hide who you are. We love ourselves and who we are and you cannot change that fact no matter what you do to us. The lyrics are lovely. And oh, so true. Why are people afraid of what and whom is different?  Are we not all human beings, who bleed and have feelings just like everybody else?
I noticed in the movie, blue angel, at the cabaret where ever the performers went. They were constantly monitored/watched by a Nazi police. Which I found interesting to watch.


175a. If a male has sexual interactions with another male he is guilty and will be imprisoned for up to ten years, losing his civil rights unless he is a minor, there will be a lesser charge or penalty.
175b. Anyone having sex with animals will be imprisoned and lose their civil rights.
 “The idea of freedom as duty turns back into itself and becomes unfreedom to the extent to which it neglects the irreducible factors of the external world” (murdaco).  Although we are free in society there are many restrictions placed on our behavior, even it is something that makes us happy, shared with a partner, is healthy, even leading to a fulfilling life and does not hurt anyone. There is always a limit on our rights and our freedom.  Things were hard in Germany and quiet a few people joined the cabaret to make money and have somewhere to belong especially if they felt as if they did not belong based on restrictions in society.
 

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Assignment #04: Quote from Agnes Heller


 “Being born into any society and any social group means that members of this particular society and social group must learn about and practice the norms and rules of that particular society and social group. This is the process called ‘socialization’. Normally, different sets of norms and rules apply to different groups of people (one fundamental division being that between men and women).  Accordingly, learning about and practicing norms and rules is tantamount to two distinct sets of behavior. On the one hand it means knowing, practicing and expecting a certain set of norms and rules; on the other it means knowing and expecting, but not practicing the same set of norms and rules – in other words, in-group and out-group behavior. “   -Agnes Heller.

            Agnes Heller was born, May 12, 1929 in Budapest Hungary.  She is currently a professor at the new school of social research in New York. She has a Ph.D. from the Lorand Eotvos University and her concentration is ethics and political philosophy, Marx, Hegel. Jewish, Agnes and her family were in constant danger in the 1940’s.  In 1947 she started her studies at the University and joined the communist party. She openly criticized the soviet suppression of the Prague spring of 1968. She was expelled several times for her candid views. She won the Lessing prize for Philosophy activity in 1981, the Szeehenyi national prize in Hungary in 1995, the Hannah Arendt prize for political philosophy in 1995 and the Sonning prize in 2006.

It seems if you are rich, you follow one set of rules and if you are poor, you follow a totally different set of rules. Clearly Agnes spoke for people in general, not a particular group but in general for all. She spoke out against the oppression/suppression of people in society constantly, and was always punished for it, causing her expulsion from the university which she worked for on and off over the years.  Also in that era the 1940’s,  women were oppressed, not considered strong, not allowed to speak out, and existed about several steps behind the man of the house, yet she still held her ground and stuck with her beliefs, among them, freedom of expression. There will always be social conflicts because we are all individuals who live with different rules and ideologies. She was constantly exposed /faced with authoritarianism in her social circle as well as at work.  It is clear she is trying to make a difference in society, maybe change the world. She challenged restrictions against the people.  Maybe, she was trying to follow the Marxist theory as Praxis.  The fusion of theory and practice (Murdaco).  Well there is a saying practice what you preach and she certainly did. This shows how compelling and strong her character is as a woman and a feminist.

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari was illusive, consisting of foreshadows, until the murders of course, clearly portraying  how people in power or of a higher status use it to influence or abuse others , in most cases for their own gain and to achieve power. In the movie, things are not what they seem or what you see is not what you are going to get.  However the movie shows the good, the bad, and the oppressed, the justice verses the injustice. I liked the double edged meaning of the movie, even though it was crafty and absolutely insane.

·         Agnes Heller (2000) The Frankfurt School, 2 December 2005 

·         [11] Copyright: Agnes Heller;
First published: 1987 by Basil Blackwell Ltd;
HTML Mark-up: Andy Blunden, 2003.